Posts by Jonathan Drake

141

Schoolyard bully mentality

by FusionTheism in

i'm not naming names, but i just want to encourage people on here or on reddit or twitter, and tell you that you do not have to tolerate people who act like schoolyard bullies in the way they speak to you online.

i think anonymity is a big part of it.

they feel like there is zero accountability so they can be a bully all they want.. i recommend just ignoring or blocking anyone who is verbally abusive or treats you like schoolyard bullies treated you.. life is way too short to spend any time dealing with those kinds of people..

Jonathan Drake

Maybe it shouldnt if you were dealing with machinery made of steel but we are dealing with humans with hearts who are coming out of a bad storm (religiously speaking)
Have you heard the saying
At the end of the day people won't remember what you said or did,they will remember how you made them feel.
Let me just go ahead and address the elephant in the room....the A word (atheism) or would it be the T word (theism)?
I say that because this seems to be where we all feel the most angst,
If the theists are to be reached it is NOT going to be by the methods some here use.
So if the goal of a poster (theist or atheist) is to try to reach people then they may want to consider that.
If that is not their goal - then the methods speak to it being something else entirely that is at work.

Well I can't disagree; this is a very good point. People will remember how they are made to feel first. This is why I try to stay as respectful as I can (though I have my moments).

This is very difficult though, because the majority (absolutely not all, but the majority) of theists are made to feel that they are being attacked rather easily. Usually, this feeling arises the moment cognitive dissonance takes place. Because of this what you suggest, and I wish was always possible, of avoiding making them feel attacked is sort of impossible. I'd argue it's absolutely impossible in this sort of setting, devoid of all body language and tone of voice.

Take for example my dad. During one of our many discussions he positioned that people of the world who aren't Jehovah's witnesses actually age faster. In support of this he stated all the people he went to high school with are his age (mid forties) but look like they are 60 or older. My response was a perfectly rational question, "do you feel it rational and logical to compare the few people from your highschool to the 8 billion others on earth?" There was silence for a few seconds and I could literally see the dissonance happen. The response I got was to be insulted and told I was being a know it all and much more. Clearly he felt attacked, but would you say he had merit to feel that way?

this is the problem. Theists react to reasonable investigation of their faith as though it some how makes them victims of some attack. It does not.

141

Schoolyard bully mentality

by FusionTheism in

i'm not naming names, but i just want to encourage people on here or on reddit or twitter, and tell you that you do not have to tolerate people who act like schoolyard bullies in the way they speak to you online.

i think anonymity is a big part of it.

they feel like there is zero accountability so they can be a bully all they want.. i recommend just ignoring or blocking anyone who is verbally abusive or treats you like schoolyard bullies treated you.. life is way too short to spend any time dealing with those kinds of people..

Jonathan Drake

Maybe you are referring to other things he has posted elsewhere but his opening post here was entirely reasonable.

I disagree because it's just not reasonable to suggest not listening to opposing positions. Even if those positions are presented in a direct hostile way (which what he's referring to, so far as I've read, has not been), it does not delegitimize the opposing claim.

What is being suggested by the OP is deliberately taking measures to shield oneself from the possibility of being wrong. This isn't much different from the governing body telling witnesses to stay off of apostate websites and not go to college. It's for the same reason, to avoid facing a slap by reality and having the illusion fall away. It's an unhealthy lifestyle that has resulted in terrible things in our world.

I honestly understand not wanting to walk through the door of reason and choosing to remain coddled by dogma. I've been that person. But educating myself on the damage being that person has done to our species and being brave enough to walk through that door has changed my view of life from an apathetic waiting game of Jesus to a passionate desire to actively make the world a better place. This is what happens when you set aside dogma and faith.

ill qualify that by adding it may be unhealthy to remove faith for some. Such as older ones who have wasted their entire lives. But I do not think this is such a scenario.

141

Schoolyard bully mentality

by FusionTheism in

i'm not naming names, but i just want to encourage people on here or on reddit or twitter, and tell you that you do not have to tolerate people who act like schoolyard bullies in the way they speak to you online.

i think anonymity is a big part of it.

they feel like there is zero accountability so they can be a bully all they want.. i recommend just ignoring or blocking anyone who is verbally abusive or treats you like schoolyard bullies treated you.. life is way too short to spend any time dealing with those kinds of people..

Jonathan Drake

I learned about the nature of science the hard way. After an undergraduate education in biology at a small southern college, I was determined to get a Ph.D in evolutionary genetics at the best laboratory in that field ... But soon after I arrived and began working on evolution in fruit flies, I thought I'd made a terrible mistake.
Shy and reserved, I felt as if I'd been hurled into a pit of unrelenting negativity. In research seminars, the audience seemed determined to dismantle the credibility of the speaker. Sometimes they wouldn't even wait until the question period after the talk, but would rudely shout out critical questions and comments during the talk itself. When I thought I had a good idea and tentatively described it to my fellow graduate students, it was picked apart like a flounder on a plate ... Eventually, fearful of being criticized, I simply kept my mouth shut and listened. That went on for two years.
But in the end, that listening was my education in science, for I learned that the pervasive doubt and criticality weren't intended as personal attacks, but we're actually the essential ingredients in science, used as a form of quality control to uncover the researchers misconceptions and mistakes.
- Jerry Coyne, "Faith VS Fact

You mistake what the people you aren't naming are doing for personal attacks when really what it is, is your first experience with the quality control of an open forum. You are having to face people who disagree with you on reasonable and factual grounds and you aren't liking it at all.

You must learn to deal with this reasonably. Reacting this way is only showing everyone you cannot deal with being wrong and cannot handle any substantial dialogue.

182

The Case for Theism

by FusionTheism in

"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.

" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.

atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.

Jonathan Drake

Point completely missed.

182

The Case for Theism

by FusionTheism in

"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.

" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.

atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.

Jonathan Drake

I`m not against people expressing their beliefs..
I`m against people who relentlessly beat people over the head with them..
They still have a WBT$ JW Mind Set..They serve no one but themselves..
.
Someone who is deeply entrenched in the Idea of the Existance of God..
Is`nt going to jump straight to abandoning a belief in God..
Those people need time to think,they have`nt done that in a very long time..
They literally need to rehabilitate their ability to think on their own again..
Intellectually beating the shit out of them every chance you get..
Will only cripple them further..

Ok, I understand this point of view. Now I will explain why I disagree with it.

firstly, in my case part of the reason I engage theists is not only for them, but for onlookers. Faith and religious belief are a poison in our society. This is by no means merely an opinion I share but a fact of our world. I've elsewhere elaborated on why, and as a freed mind you likely are aware of these anyway (stem cell research banned, gay rights opposed and hated, blood transfusions killing people, Blood Libel dogma paving the way for Hitler and the holocaust, crusades, Muslkm terrorists attacks, and many more).

the poison of faith that results in all of this badness spreads all to easily through apparently reasonable arguments. In allowing these arguments to stand without tearing them to bits you risk someone falling victim to them and further spreading these monstrous ideas that kill many thousands and millions.

Second, I engage them for their benefit and for the sake of society. I actively post aggressive stands on Facebook as well. This is because the beliefs of these people are absolutely not benign. You say in this quote that you oppose people forcing their beliefs on others. But this betrays what I see as a lack of knowledge regarding how theists affect your world.

Cofty stated that you were or are a moderator on a forum where people claim God speaks to them. Would you approve of someone who makes such claims having any official capacity in your government? Or in any government? I sincerely doubt you would, yet that is the reality. People have office, especially in the United States, who actively make decisions on policy of the government or other actions that are obviously influenced by their faith. They thus force their beliefs on entire countries. Would you not oppose this?

It is not considered appropriate to challenge theists, a position you seem to share. But they MUST be challenged. They must be required to give evidence supporting their world views if those views are going to directly affect BILLIONS. If a person is going to be forced to suffer it MUST be for a good reason and not for faith, which by definition gives no reason.

21

i'm stupid, right?

by embarrassed in

i am on here as another member, but even with a username and not revealing my identity, i am still too embarrassed to use it.

had to make up a new one.

that being said.... my boyfriend is watching pornography, and it seriously hurts my feelings.

Jonathan Drake

You are not stupid. do not think of yourself that way. All of us long to be loved, this is really what you're talking about here isn't it? This doesn't make you stupid, it makes you like all of us everywhere on the planet.

Having said that, everyone deserves to be happy. At the risk of encroaching on territory not my business, it seems this relationship doesn't make you happy. It even seems possible that it causes pain.

only you know your true feelings, but if you're not happy you deserve to be - IMO you should seek out someone to be happy with.

182

The Case for Theism

by FusionTheism in

"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.

" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.

atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.

Jonathan Drake

Don`t repeatedly claim you can prove there is Evidence of No god..
Then beat people up because they won`t accept your lack of proof..Or..

The evidence against God is abundant because of the evidence against all the sources of theism. But I take it you know this and agree with that evidence and that what we are really dealing with is your view that actively opposing theists in an aggressive debate sort of way is inappropriate?

Is this correct? Because I want to make sure I understand your thoughts here before I respond with my own.

182

The Case for Theism

by FusionTheism in

"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.

" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.

atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.

Jonathan Drake

@outlaw

I may be mistaken but I think you're just engaging in a semantic argument. Nothing is actually be said here.

whether Dawkins expresses himself to be atheist or agnostic he takes the position that the lack of evidence for God and the mounting evidence against all the supporting pillars of theism should make it crumble to dust. In line with this he is doing his best to make it a reality.

He often speaks out against theists actions and beliefs. You should watch his Twitter feed.

The position you appear to be taking serves no purpose.

182

The Case for Theism

by FusionTheism in

"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.

" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.

atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.

Jonathan Drake

I admit I am godless!

182

The Case for Theism

by FusionTheism in

"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.

" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.

atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.

Jonathan Drake

cofty - Once again so many people are hung up on the word "proof". It has no place in this sort of conversation. It belongs to mathematicians.

Yes, I see I actually misused "proof" too. I should have said "evidence"